Carbon dating questions Adult chat with womens hair
And while we call the assumptions behind the long-age evolutionary creation myth into question, we also provide an alternative.We point to biblical history as reliable and accurate, and we do our science within that framework.See for example 101 evidences for a young of the earth and the universe."Scientific dating is not a way of measuring but a way of thinking." Science is a way of thinking and of course does require assumptions.
It just says that the assumptions are using the same beliefs.There is no 'scientific' method that could give us that knowledge.By the same method we know the age of the earth from the histroy provided in the Bible, which is accurate and reliable.Later, this date was confirmed by two other dating methods (paleomagnetism and fission tracks), and was widely accepted.Then Richard Leakey found a skull (called KNM-ER 1470) the KBS tuff, a skull that looked far too modern to be 3 million years old.
Search for carbon dating questions:
It seems to me that while creation ministries likes to question current scientific assumptions, they put forward no answers that are not subject to the same, if not more, criticism.